Dunk Low Certified Fresh

The Tomatometer score – based on the opinions of hundreds of film and television critics – is a trusted measurement of critical recommendation for millions of fans.

A Certified Fresh movie or TV season whose score drops and remains consistently below 70% will lose the Certified Fresh designation. The certification removal might not happen as soon as the score drops below 70%; as with CF designation, removal will take place when the score settles.

Rotten Tomatoes and the Tomatometer score are the world’s most trusted recommendation resources for quality entertainment. As the leading online aggregator of movie and TV show reviews from critics, we provide fans with a comprehensive guide to what’s Fresh – and what’s Rotten – in theaters and at home. And the Tomatometer is just the beginning. We also serve movie and TV fans with original editorial content on our site and through social channels, produce fun and informative video series, and hold live events for fans across the country, with our ‘Your Opinion Sucks’ live shows. If you’re an entertainment fan looking for a recommendation, or to share an opinion, you’ve come to the right place.When less than 60% of users give a movie or TV show a star rating of 3.5 or higher, a tipped over popcorn bucket is displayed to indicate its Rotten status.

Rotten Tomatoes has assembled a team of curators whose job it is to read thousands of movie and TV reviews weekly. The team collects movie and TV reviews from Tomatometer-approved critics and publications every day, generating Tomatometer scores. Our curators carefully read these reviews, noting if the reviews are Fresh or Rotten, and choose a representative pull-quote. Tomatometer-approved critics can also self-submit their reviews.Certified Fresh status is a special distinction awarded to the best-reviewed movies and TV shows. In order to qualify, movies or TV shows must meet the following requirements:The Tomatometer score represents the percentage of professional critic reviews that are positive for a given film or television show. A Tomatometer score is calculated for a movie or TV show after it receives at least five reviews.

The above requirements for Certified Fresh status are only the bare minimum a film must achieve to qualify for the distinction. A film does not automatically become Certified Fresh when it meets those requirements. The Tomatometer score must be consistent and unlikely to deviate significantly before a film or TV show is marked Certified Fresh.

When there is no Tomatometer® score available, which could be because the Title hasn’t released yet or there are not enough ratings to generate a score.Back in the days of the open theaters, when a play was particularly atrocious, the audience expressed their dissatisfaction by not only booing and hissing at the stage, but also throwing whatever was at hand – vegetables and fruits included.

The Audience Score, denoted by a popcorn bucket, represents the percentage of users who have rated a movie or TV show positively. With films for which we can verify users have bought a ticket, the default Audience Score we show is made up of “Verified Ratings,” which represents the percentage of users who have rated a movie or TV show positively who we can verify bought a ticket; it is displayed once enough of those Verified Ratings are in to form a score. For all other titles, we display an “All Audience Score” that includes ratings from people regardless of whether or not we can currently verify they have seen the movie or show. Titles eligible for Verified Ratings have an All Audience Score, too: To see it, just click on the popcorn bucket and you can toggle between both the Verified Audience Score and the All Audience Score. You can read more about recent changes to the score box HERE.

Films are further classified based on film genre. Each movie is eligible in only one genre, aside from non-English-language films, which can be included in both their genre and the respective “Foreign” category.As of April 11, 2022, Rotten Tomatoes is a top 1000 site, being the 593rd highest-ranked website in the world, and #254 in the United States, according to website ranker Alexa.

In February 2021, Rotten Tomatoes added an “Audience Says” section; similar to the “Critics Consensus”, it summarizes the reviews noted by registered users into a concise blurb. In a blog memo, the Rotten Tomatoes staff noted that for any given film, if there were any external factors such as controversies or issues affecting the sentiments of a film, they may address it in the “Audience Says” section in order to give users the most relevant info regarding their viewing choices. When a film or TV show reaches the requirements for the “Certified Fresh”, it is not automatically granted the seal, but is instead flagged for the staff’s consideration. Once the team assesses the reviews and response to the film or TV show, and decide that it is unlikely that the score will fall below the minimum requirements in the future, they will then mark it as “Certified Fresh”. Rotten Tomatoes deliberately withheld the critic score for Justice League based on early reviews until the premiere of its See It/Skip It episode on the Thursday before its release. Some critics viewed the move as a ploy to promote the web series, but some argued that the move was a deliberate conflict of interest on account of Warner Bros.’ ownership of the film and Rotten Tomatoes, and the tepid critical reception of the DC Extended Universe films at the time.In July 2017, the website’s editor-in-chief since 2007, Matt Atchity, left to join The Young Turks YouTube channel. On November 1, 2017, the site launched a new web series on Facebook, See It/Skip It, hosted by Jacqueline Coley and Segun Oduolowu.

American director Martin Scorsese wrote a column in The Hollywood Reporter criticizing both Rotten Tomatoes and CinemaScore for promoting the idea that films like Mother! had to be “instantly liked” to be successful. Scorsese, in a dedication for the Roger Ebert Center for Film Studies at the University of Illinois later continued his criticism, voicing that Rotten Tomatoes and other review services “Devalue cinema on streaming platforms to the level of ‘content’.”Rotten Tomatoes is an American review-aggregation website for film and television. The company was launched in August 1998 by three undergraduate students at the University of California, Berkeley: Senh Duong, Patrick Y. Lee, and Stephen Wang. Although the name “Rotten Tomatoes” connects to the practice of audiences throwing rotten tomatoes in disapproval of a poor stage performance, the direct inspiration for the name from Duong, Lee, and Wang came from an equivalent scene in the 1992 Canadian film Léolo.

Rotten Tomatoes staff first collect online reviews from writers who are certified members of various writing guilds or film critic-associations. To be accepted as a critic on the website, a critic’s original reviews must garner a specific number of “likes” from users. Those classified as “Top Critics” generally write for major newspapers. The critics upload their reviews to the movie page on the website, and need to mark their review “fresh” if it’s generally favorable or “rotten” otherwise. It is necessary for the critic to do so as some reviews are qualitative and do not grant a numeric score, making it impossible for the system to be automatic.In February 2016, Rotten Tomatoes and its parent site Flixster were sold to Comcast’s Fandango Media. Warner Bros retained a minority stake in the merged entities, including Fandango. Each movie features a brief blurb summary of the critics’ reviews, called the “Critical Consensus”, used in that entry’s Tomatometer aggregate score. These are written by Jeff Giles, a longtime author for the site. On February 26, 2019, in response to issues surrounding coordinated “bombing” of user reviews for several films, most notably Captain Marvel and Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker, prior to their release, the site announced that user reviews would no longer be accepted until a film is publicly released. The site also announced plans to introduce a system for “verified” reviews, and that the “Want to See” statistic would now be expressed as a number so that it would not be confused with the audience score.The films are divided into wide release and limited release categories. Limited releases are defined as opening in 599 or fewer theaters at initial release. Platform releases, movies initially released under 600 theaters but later receiving wider distribution, fall under this definition. Any film opening in more than 600 theaters is considered wide release. There are also two categories purely for British and Australian films. The “User”-category represents the highest rated film among users, and the “Mouldy”-award represents the worst-reviewed films of the year. A movie must have 40 (originally 20) or more rated reviews to be considered for domestic categories. It must have 500 or more user ratings to be considered for the “User”-category.In 2015, while promoting the film Suffragette (which has a 73% approval rating) actress Meryl Streep accused Rotten Tomatoes of disproportionately representing the opinions of male film critics, resulting in a skewed ratio that adversely affected the commercial performances of female-driven films. “I submit to you that men and women are not the same, they like different things”, she said. “Sometimes they like the same thing, but sometimes their tastes diverge. If the Tomatometer is slighted so completely to one set of tastes that drives box office in the United States, absolutely.” Critics took issue with the sentiment that someone’s gender or ethnic background would dictate their response to art.

Duong teamed up with University of California, Berkeley classmates Patrick Y. Lee and Stephen Wang, his former partners at the Berkeley, California-based web design firm Design Reactor, to pursue Rotten Tomatoes on a full-time basis. They officially launched it on April 1, 2000.In January 2010, on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the New York Film Critics Circle, its chairman Armond White cited Rotten Tomatoes in particular and film review aggregators in general as examples of how “the Internet takes revenge on individual expression”. He said they work by “dumping reviewers onto one website and assigning spurious percentage-enthusiasm points to the discrete reviews”. According to White, such websites “offer consensus as a substitute for assessment”.Landon Palmer, a film and media historian and an Assistant Professor in the Department of Journalism and Creative Media director in the College of Communication and Information Sciences at the University of Alabamaagreed with White, stating that “[Rotten Tomatoes applies a] problematic algorithm to pretty much all avenues of modern media art and entertainment.”The scores have reached a level of online ubiquity which film companies have found threatening. For instance, the scores are regularly posted in Google search results for films so reviewed. Furthermore, the scores are prominently featured in Fandango’s popular ticket purchasing website, on its mobile app, on popular streaming services like Peacock, and on Flixster, which led to complaints that “rotten” scores damaged films’ performances.

Director and producer Brett Ratner has criticized the website for “reducing hundreds of reviews culled from print and online sources into a popularized aggregate score”, while expressing respect for traditional film critics. Writer Max Landis, following his film Victor Frankenstein receiving an approval rating of 24% on the site, wrote that the site “breaks down entire reviews into just the word ‘yes’ or ‘no’, making criticism binary in a destructive arbitrary way”.On May 24, 2019, Rotten Tomatoes introduced a verified rating system that would replace the earlier system where users were merely required to register in order to submit a rating. So, in addition to creating an account, users will have to verify their ticket purchase through Fandango Media, a ticketing company which Rotten Tomatoes is a subsidiary of. While users can still leave reviews without verifying, those reviews will not account for the average audience score displayed next to the Tomatometer.

In 2000, Rotten Tomatoes announced the RT Awards honoring the best-reviewed films of the year according to the website’s rating system. The awards were later renamed the Golden Tomato Awards. The nominees and winners are announced on the website, although there is no actual awards ceremony.That marketing tactic can backfire, and drew the vocal disgust of influential critics such as Roger Ebert, who was prone to derisively condemn such moves, with gestures such as “The Wagging Finger of Shame”, on At the Movies. Furthermore, the very nature of withholding reviews can draw early conclusions from the public that the film is of poor quality because of that marketing tactic.

Localized versions of the site available in the United Kingdom, India, and Australia were discontinued following the acquisition of Rotten Tomatoes by Fandango. The Mexican version of the site, Tomatazos [es], remains active.”Top Critics”, such as Roger Ebert, Desson Thomson, Stephen Hunter, Owen Gleiberman, Lisa Schwarzbaum, Peter Travers and Michael Phillips are identified in a sub-listing that calculates their reviews separately. Their opinions are also included in the general rating. When there are sufficient reviews, the staff creates and posts a consensus statement to express the general reasons for the collective opinion of the film.

In April of 2023, a 2017 film titled The Snowman, starring Michael Fassbender reached the No. 1 spot in America on Netflix’s Current Top 10 Most Watched list, despite it holding a score on Rotten Tomatoes of 6%.By late 2009, the website was designed to enable Rotten Tomatoes users to create and join groups to discuss various aspects of film. One group, “The Golden Oyster Awards”, accepted votes of members for various awards, spoofing the better-known Academy Awards or Golden Globes. When Flixster bought the company, they disbanded the groups.

Others have argued that filmmakers and studios have only themselves to blame if Rotten Tomatoes produces a bad score, as this only reflects a poor reception among film critics. As one independent film distributor marketing executive noted, “To me, it’s a ridiculous argument that Rotten Tomatoes is the problem … make a good movie!”. ComScore’s Paul Dergarabedian had similar comments, saying: “The best way for studios to combat the ‘Rotten Tomatoes Effect’ is to make better movies, plain and simple”.Despite arguments on how Rotten Tomatoes scores impact the box office, academic researchers so far have not found evidence that Rotten Tomatoes ratings affect box office performance.

Since January 2010, Rotten Tomatoes has been owned by Flixster, which was in turn acquired by Warner Bros. in 2011. In February 2016, Rotten Tomatoes and its parent site Flixster were sold to Comcast’s Fandango. Warner Bros. retained a minority stake in the merged entities, including Fandango. The Rotten Tomatoes API provides limited access to critic and audience ratings and reviews, allowing developers to incorporate Rotten Tomatoes data on other websites. The free service is intended for use in the US only; permission is required for use elsewhere. As of 2022, API access is restricted to approved developers that must go through an application process. Major Hollywood studios have come to see Rotten Tomatoes as a potential threat to their marketing. In 2017, several blockbuster films like Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales, Baywatch and The Mummy were projected to open with gross receipts of $90 million, $50 million and $45 million, respectively, but ended up debuting with $62.6 million, $23.1 million and $31.6 million. Rotten Tomatoes, which scored the films at 30%, 19% and 16%, respectively, was blamed for undermining them. That same summer, films like Wonder Woman and Spider-Man: Homecoming (both 92%) received high scores and opened at or exceeded expectations with their $100+ million trackings.

Rotten Tomatoes was launched on August 12, 1998, as a spare-time project by Senh Duong. His objective in creating Rotten Tomatoes was “to create a site where people can get access to reviews from a variety of critics in the U.S”. As a fan of Jackie Chan, Duong was inspired to create the website after collecting all the reviews of Chan’s Hong Kong action movies as they were being released in the United States. The catalyst for the creation of the website was Rush Hour (1998), Chan’s first major Hollywood crossover, which was originally planned to release in August 1998. Duong coded the website in two weeks and the site went live the same month, but the release of Rush Hour was delayed until September 1998. Besides Jackie Chan films, he began including other films on Rotten Tomatoes, extending it beyond Chan’s fandom. The first non-Chan Hollywood movie whose reviews were featured on Rotten Tomatoes was Your Friends & Neighbors (1998). The website was an immediate success, receiving mentions by Netscape, Yahoo!, and USA Today within the first week of its launch; it attracted “600–1,000 daily unique visitors” as a result.The website keeps track of all the reviews counted for each film and calculates the percentage of positive reviews. Major recently released films can attract more than 400 reviews. If the positive reviews make up 60% or more, the film is considered “fresh”. If the positive reviews are less than 60%, the film is considered “rotten”. An average score on a 0 to 10 scale is also calculated. With each review, a short excerpt of the review is quoted that also serves a hyperlink to the complete review essay for anyone interested to read the critic’s full thoughts on the subject. As of February 2011, new community features have been added and others removed. For example, users can no longer sort films by Fresh Ratings from Rotten Ratings, and vice versa. Once a film is considered eligible, its “votes” are counted. Each critic from the website’s list gets one vote (as determined by their review), all weighted equally. Because reviews are continually added, manually and otherwise, a cutoff date at which new reviews are not counted toward the Golden Tomato awards is initiated each year, usually the first of the new year. Reviews without ratings are not counted toward the results of the Golden Tomato Awards.As result of this concern, 20th Century Fox commissioned a 2015 study, titled “Rotten Tomatoes and Box Office”, that stated the website combined with social media was going to be an increasingly serious complication for the film business: “The power of Rotten Tomatoes and fast-breaking word of mouth will only get stronger. Many Millennials and even Gen X-ers now vet every purchase through the Internet, whether it’s restaurants, video games, make-up, consumer electronics or movies. As they get older and comprise an even larger share of total moviegoers, this behavior is unlikely to change”. Other studios have commissioned a number of studies on the subject, with them finding that 7/10 people said they would be less interested in seeing a film if the Rotten Tomatoes score was below 25%, and that the site has the most influence on people 25 and younger.

In February 2021, a new “What to Know” section was created for each film entry, combining the “Critics Consensus” and a new “Audience Says” blurbs within it, to give users an at-a-glance summary of the general sentiments of a film as experienced by critics and audiences. Prior to February 2021, only the “Critics Consensus” blurb was posted for each entry, after enough certified critics had submitted reviews. When the “Audience Says” blurbs were added, Rotten Tomatoes initially included them only for newer films and those with a significant audience rating, but suggested that they may later add them for older films as well.

The New York Times aggregated statistics on the critical reception of audience scores versus critic scores, and noticed in almost every genre that “The public rates a movie more positively than do the critics. The only exceptions are black comedies and documentaries. Critics systematically rate films in these genres more highly than do Rotten Tomatoes users.” Slate magazine, a subsidiary of The New York Times, collected data in a similar survey that revealed a noticeable favor for movies released before the 1990s, that “may be explained by a bias toward reviewers reviewing, or Rotten Tomatoes scoring, only the best movies from bygone eras.”

If you are at an office or shared network, you can ask the network administrator to run a scan across the network looking for misconfigured or infected devices. The Jordan Dunks features a nylon tongue with a Nike tag on top whereas the Nike Jordan 1 displays a Jumpman logo on the woven tongue. On the heel, the Dunk Low adorns a stitched Nike logo contrastingly the Nike Jordan 1 features a Wings logo. As we discussed earlier you can see in the pictures the Nike Dunk Low midsole has some details and variation while the Nike Jordan 1 Low has a simpler midsole.

Though we accept the fact that the two products look quite alike, let us confirm they are not. Even small details like subtle curves make each product unique.

The Dunk Lows have more details on the midsole. For example, cutting in to accentuate the hourglass shape near the midfoot and showing a bit of variation where the outsole meets the midsole. The Jordan 1s have a simpler transition between the outer sole and the midsole.

Overall the Jordan 1 Low feature more panels, more stitching, and more lace holes. The Jordan 1s add curves where they can, while the Dunks have a steadier upper silhouette.These products come directly from our network of partner retailers, made up of private individuals and professionals all over Europe, and sometimes even further afield. They have never been worn and are delivered to you in their original box with all accessories. A seal is attached to the product and an authenticity card is also in the box, certifying that the necessary checks have been carried out.

All products sold on Wethenew are authentic. Before arriving in your hands, they have been checked by our experts to ensure their quality and authenticity, which sometimes explains the longer delivery times… And yes, good things do take time.

Our mission is to give sneaker and streetwear fans, enthusiasts and the curious the chance to buy their favourite products with complete confidence. Whether you’re looking for a limited edition product, the hottest pair at the moment or the perfect piece of streetwear, you’ve come to the right place.

Die Farbe, die Nähte, der Geruch, die Form, das Aussehen aber vor allem dasErfahrung von uns Experten und ihre Kenntnisse in der Authentifizierung erlauben es uns versichern Ihnen 100% authentische Turnschuhe.Adidas now plans to release Yeezy silhouettes without Ye or the Yeezy branding as early as this year. But for many sneaker purists, it won’t be the same.

The Samba has been around since 1949 when it debuted as a soccer shoe. This year, Adidas is releasing a highly anticipated collab with designer JJJJound. The company has also successfully partnered with British designer Grace Wales Bonner on multiple Samba releases, including in June 2022.

Established shoe brands like Allbirds and Veja are both well-known for manufacturing sustainable sneakers. Industry giants Nike and Adidas have begun touting the use of recycled plastic in some of their designs.Chunky performance shoes are now firmly part of casual wear. So expect to see more Hoka One One, Asics, On, and Salomon shoes on feet in 2023 in and out of the gym.

With so many pairs of Dunks and New Balance 550s released to the public during the pandemic, they will be easy to spot on the street in 2023, but the hype for these shoes will cool down this year.”Soccer trainers, AKA Sambas, are really in right now. And a lot of that comes from this sort of like post-World Cup hysteria,” Newberger said. “It’s a kind of shoe that they’ve already been loving for a long time in the UK or overseas.”Ye has given those shoes “a bad connotation,” Brendan Cannon, stylist at Cannon Media Group.. “People just don’t want to wear Yeezys because they don’t want to have people say comments to them on the street.”

Some specific silhouettes expected to be popular with consumers in the new year include the Hoka Clifton and the Asics Gel-Kayano, stylists said. Another good example of this trend is the Salomon XT-6. 2023’s casual look includes wearing straight-leg or wide-leg pants and an oversized tee or vest. Tracksuits and sweatsuits are also back. Donning sneakers with dresses is also acceptable. “The Salomon XT-6 is a big shoe for 2023 for the simple fact that you get a nice, comfortable shoe that appeals to lots of different consumers, ” Bryce Moore, a sneaker and fashion Youtuber, said. The Salomon’s XT-6 comes in a wide range of colors across general releases and collaborations.Comfortable and relaxed clothing has long been the best way to style your favorite pair of sneakers. And the casual trend will continue, stylists predict.

There are also a slew of footwear startups focused solely on sustainability, including Holo, Blueview. Unless Collective, a Portland, Oregon-based streetwear startup founded by a former Adidas executive, recently released a new shoe called the Degenerate, which will decompose at the end of its useful life.We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page..

Unsere Produkte werden mit ihrer Originalverpackung und ihrem Originalzubehör geliefert, mit einem von unseren Experten ausgestellten Echtheitszertifikat versehen..Je nachdem, in welches Land Sie liefern, können Sie bezahlen über Visa, Mastercard, Amex, Paypal, Apple Pay, Amazon Pay, Bancontact, iDeal, Giropay, Sofort, Eps, Giropay, SoFort oder noch Przelewy24.

Der Nike Dunk Low Certified Fresh hat eine weiße Canvas-Basis, die durch weiche, hellgraue Wildleder-Overlays wie Mudguard, Ösen und Quarter Panel hervorgehoben wird. Auffällig ist der seitliche Swoosh in Schwarz, der einen Kontrast zum Obermaterial bildet und sich mit dem Nike-Branding bis zur Ferse erstreckt. Das Ganze ruht auf einer cremefarbenen Mittelsohle, die mit ihrer hellgrauen Outsole gekoppelt ist.Um dir ihre Originalität zu garantieren, halten wir uns an einen sehr strengen Prozess wir überprüfen die Materialien, Accessoires, Farben, Nähte, Etiketten, den Geruch und die Verpackung deiner Produkte.Alle Bestellungen werden per Paket mit Sendungsverfolgung und Übergabe gegen Unterschrift Das Ziel ist, dir eine schnelle und sichere Lieferung zu garantieren.

Viele Deals wurden auf Kleinanzeigen gemacht, seit dein Browser das Licht der Welt erblickt hat. Um weiterhin alle Funktionen einwandfrei nutzen zu können, solltest du ihn aktualisieren. Wir empfehlen Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Edge oder Safari, falls du macOS benutzt.

In der Standard-Sortierung, ohne Eingabe eines Ortes, werden neueste Anzeigen (alternativ änderbar auf “Günstigste zuerst”) oben gezeigt. Diese werden mit Eingabe eines Ortes auf den Ort bzw. den Radius eingegrenzt. Falls ein Ort sowie ein Radius ausgewählt wurde, ist auch die Sortierung nach Geringste Entfernung zuerst möglich.

‘For those looking for a few extra style points, the Dunk High is your perfect option,’ says Schlemmer. ‘Seen a little less regularly than the Dunk Low but arguably even more elevated, the high-top Dunk pairs perfectly with jeans and other trousers. For another fresh take on the classic two-tone color-block design, the Knicks edition is a strong choice — the vibrant pair riffs off the team colors of the New York Knicks in eye-catching orange and blue. Released in July 2022, this unmistakable style is reminiscent of the 1999 City Attack Japan-exclusive.’ For more high-impact releases of the Dunk High, look to the Strawberry Cough, 1985 and Retro designs — all available to shop on FARFETCH.

SB — Nike’s skateboarding division — has released many fresh colorways of the Dunk Low over the years. ‘The biggest reason that the Nike Dunk has remained so popular for so long is Nike SB. It’s been churning out hot colorways of the skate-ready Dunk since the early 2000s,’ explains Schlemmer. One of the most popular SB Dunks of 2022 is the Philadelphia Phillies edition from the Bubblegum pack, which celebrates various Major League Baseball teams. ‘The upper takes inspiration from the Philadelphia Phillies’ powder-blue uniforms, and the outsole even includes a pink blob in the rubber to mimic chewed-up gum stuck to your sole,’ he highlights. With suede fabrications, vintage-inspired colorways and customized patchwork designs, the SB Dunk Low serves as a unique take on a sneaker classic.‘You can’t talk about the Dunk without mentioning women’s exclusive releases,’ says Schlemmer. After the massive popularity of the aptly named black and white ‘Panda’ Dunk, womenswear styles have driven much of the market: ‘Some of the best Dunks right now are styles designed for women, and one of the most unique new versions is this Terry Swoosh edition. It has a great mix of materials — from the fun, fuzzy Swooshes and textured leather base to the suede overlay panels — and an easy-to-wear palette,’ Schlemmer adds. More notable women’s Dunk styles on FARFETCH include the ‘Sunset Pulse’, ‘Vintage Green’ and ‘Pink Oxford’ colorways.

In terms of size and fit, the Nike Dunk remains true to size, so we recommend you get your regular size. The silhouette has a roomy fit, with a fully cushioned interior which ensures comfort for all-day wear.